Multifocal enhancing magnetic resonance imaging lesions following cranial irradiation.
код для вставкиСкачатьMuldocal Enhancing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions Following Cranial Irradiation Kendra Peterson, MD," H. Brent Clark, MD, PhD,"? Walter A. Hall, MD,S and Charles L. Truwit, MD"B Radiation necrosis is a delayed complication of cranial irradiation, typically presenting as a single intracerebral mass that is radiographically indistinguishable from recurrent tumor. We describe 6 patients with a distinct radiographic syndrome of multifocal enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance images, and their variable clinical courses: some fluctuating, some spontaneously resolving, and some demonstrating fulminant progression to frank necrosis. Peterson K, Clark HB, Hall WA, Truwit CL. Multifocal enhancing magnetic resonance imaging lesions following cranial irradiation. Ann Neurol 1995;38:237-244 Radiation necrosis is a delayed complication of cranial irradiation. It generally presents clinically as a single ictracerebral mass resulting in focal neurological deficits or seizures [1-9}. Computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) usually demonstrates an irregular, enhancing mass that may have a necrotic center or hemorrhagic component, and is indistinguishable radiologically from a recurrent neoplasm [lo- 141. W e describe a distinct radiographic syndrome of multifocal enhancing lesions on MRI developing within the fields of prior cranial irradiation administered to primary brain tumors, and the clinical course of 6 patients with these MRI findings. Materials and Methods We reviewed the clinical histories, radiographic studies, and histopathology of 6 patients with multifocal enhancing lesions on MRI following cranial irradiation. Five were among the approximately 200 patients with primary brain tumors seen in the Neuro-Oncology Clinic at the University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinic from 1992 to 1994; one was seen at the Veterans Administration Medical Center in Minneapolis. Results The results are summarized in the Table, and the case histories are detailed below. There were 4 men and 2 women, ages 26 to 48 years. All received local-field external cranial irradiation for the treatment of primary brain tumors: one astrocytoma, three anaplastic astrocytomas, and two glioblastoma multiforme. Five of the patients received a total dose of 6,000 to 6,475 cGy in daily (Monday-Friday [M-F)) fractions of 175 to 200 cGy; the sixth received 7,200 cGy delivered by twice-daily (M-F) hyperfractionation in 120-cGy From the Departments of 'Neurology, thborarory Medicine and Experimental Pathology, $Neurosurgery, and §Radiology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN. doses. None of the patients had underlying vasculopathy or other concurrent illness, and none had acute neurological complications of the radiation therapy while undergoing treatment. Five patients received chemotherapy as part of the treatment regimen: 3 received carmustine (BCNU); 1, BCNU and etoposide (VP-l6)/vincristine/procarbazine;and 1, BCNU, procarbazine/lomustine (CCNU)/vincristine, and intravenous methotrexate. The MRI abnormalities appeared 8 to 31 months after completion of radiotherapy. The lesions were multifocal and dispersed throughout both gray and white matter within the treatment fields. Some were in a periventricular location. Some were punctate, while others were larger with significant surrounding edema and mass effect. The lesions enhanced after intravenous administration of contrast material, some in a ringlike pattern. Many of the lesions changed in appearance over time, waxing and waning on serial imaging studies. In 2 patients the lesions resolved completely over the course of 1 year, in 3 the lesions remained present but stabilized, and in 1 the lesions developed into frank necrosis and led to the patient's death. One of the 6 patients presented with focal neurological symptoms that prompted MRI. Five patients were asymptomatic at the time the lesions were detected on routine follow-up scans; 2 remained asymptomatic while the others subsequently developed symptoms and signs referable to the location of the MRI lesions. One patient developed panhypopituitarism as an associated delayed complication of radiotherapy. The 2 asymptomatic patients were not treated with corticosteroids or other medications; in 1 the lesions Received Feb 24, 1995, and in revised form Apr 21. Accepted for publication Apr 25, 1995. Address correspondence to Dr Peterson, Box 275, UMHC, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, M N 55455. Copyright 0 1995 by the American Neurological Association 237 Srrmniap of Results Patient No. Radiotherapy Dose1Frac tion C hem0 therapy Time“ Symptoms cs Course ~ 1 6.4 7 51 17 5 None 31 mo None No 2 3 7,2001 120 6,0001200 BCNU BCNU 8 mo 13 mo No Yes 4 6,1201 180 BCNU; VVP 14 mo None Cognitive decline, hemiparesis Initial: none Later: aphasia hemiparesis 5 6,0001200 PCV; BCNU; MTX 11 mo Yes 6 6,0001200 BCNU 17 mo Initial: none Later: aphasia Initial: none Later: hemiparesis, coma ‘Time interval berween completion of radiotherapy and development of MRI abnormalities. CS = corticosreroid trearment; BCNU = carmustine; VVP = etoposide, vincristine, procarbazine; PCV MTX Yes Yes = Waxlwane; complete resolution in 12 mo Stable for 6 mo Waxlwane; stabilize with deficits in 24 mo Progression then resolution in 12 mo; died of recurrent tumor Progression then stabilize in 24 mo Fulminant progression, death procarbazine,lomustine, vincristine; = rnethotrexatc. resolved spontaneously over 1 year, while in the other they stabilized over 6 months. All 4 patients with symptomatic lesions received corticosteroids; t h e outc o m e in these patients was variable and it is uncertain whether or not corticosteroids influenced t h e radiographic o r clinical course. Two of the patients in this series died, 1 of recurrent tumor and 1 of fulminant radiation necrosis. Four patients were alive 14 to 50 months after tumor diagnosis, 2 asymptomatic and 2 with residual neurological deficits resulting from the treatment-related nervous system injury. Biopsy of a small lesion at an early stage in an initially asymptomatic patient (Patient 6) revealed perivascular lyrnphocytic infiltrate and gliosis, though n o frank necrosis was observed in this specimen. Five months later at autopsy, extensive radiation necrosis was observed (Figs 1, 2). In the 3 o t h e r patients in whom biopsy of large, symptomatic lesions was performed, the usual features of radiation necrosis were observed. Patzetzt 1 A 35-year-old man presented with a seizure and was diagnosed with a left frontal astrocytoma detected by MRI in January 1390. He underwent surgical resection followed by local-field external irradiation in 37 daily (M-F) fractions of 175 cGp each through bilateral opposed ports, to a total dose of 6,475 cGy. He remained neurologically normal. Thirty-one months after radiotherapy, follow-up MRI revealed multifocal punctate areas of enhancement in both frontal lobes, within the radiation fields (Figs 3A, 3B). T2weighted images ( n o t shown) revealed diffuse white matter hyperintensity in the treated fields. Over the next several months the enhancing lesions waxed and waned, with some lesions resolving and other new lesions appearing. The pa- 238 Annals of Neurology Vol 38 No 2 August 1995 tient developed weight loss, generalized fatigue, and decreased motivation, and was found to have panhypopituitarism. His symptoms were alleviated by hormone replacement. The patient was followed with serial MRIs. H e did not undergo biopsy or receive other treatment. The MRIdetected lesions gradually resolved completely over 1 year from the time they were first noted (Figs 3C, 3D). H e remained neurologically normal when last examined in January 1995. Patient 2 In December 1993 a 32-year-old man suffered minor head trauma with a brief loss of consciousness. He underwent MRI, which incidentally revealed a left temporal nonenhancing mass. The results of a neurological examination were normal. He underwent partial resection of the tumor, with a histological diagnosis of anaplastic astrocytoma. The patient received local-field external hyperfractionated irradiation, 120-cGy fractions twice daily (M-F). A dose of 5,760 cGy in 48 fractions was delivered to the tumor and 3 cm surrounding the tissue, and a “boost” of 1,440 cGy in 12 fractions was delivered to the tumor and 2 cm surrounding the tissue, to a total dose of 7,200 cGy. He complained of bilateral otitis externa and developed mastoiditis and serous otitis media requiring tube placement, but otherwise tolerated the radiotherapy without difficulty. Over the next 8 months he also received four courses of intravenous BCNU (200 mg/m2/dose every 8 weeks, first course concurrent with radiotherapy). He remained well and continued working full-time. A follow-up MRI in August 1994 showed no evidence of tumor recurrence at the primary site. However, the scan revealed multiple enhancing abnormalities in the posterior fossa, appearing to be both meningeal based and intraparenchymal (Figs 4A, 4B). The lesions were within the treatment fields (Fig 4C). Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) obtained by both lumbar and cervical puncture revealed entirely normal findings, with no evidence of malignant cells. He was followed clinically with serial scans, and no biopsy or treatment. When last seen in February 1995 the appearance of his scan was unchanged. He was asymptomatic, and had mildly increased lower-extremity reflexes without ataxia, gait disorder, or other neurological abnormalities. Fig 1 . Gross appearance ofthe brain of Patient 6 at the time of autopsy. There is extensive necrosis in the deep hemispheric white matter bilaterally with expansion of the corpus cnllosum. No tumor was present in these areas. There is a defect in the right lateral temporal lobe from the original resection. Radiation necrosis was not present in this area. Fig 2. Photomicrograph of radiation necrosis in [he hemispheric white matter in Patient 6. There is coagulatrve necrosis of the uhite matter (lower right) andjibrinohyaline change in an adjacent cerebral zjeuel. ( X I70 before 46% rednction.t Patient .3 In August 1991 a 45-year-old woman developed weakness in the distal aspect of the right leg. MRI revealed a nonenhancing left frontal parasagittal mass. She underwent partial resection, and histopathology revealed anaplastic astrocytoma. She received focal cranial irradiation, 30 daily (M-F) fractions of 200 cGy each to a total dose of 6,000 cGy through right and left lateral fields. She also received six courses of BCNU chemotherapy (the first concurrent with radiotherapy, other details not known). She had residual right lower-extremity weakness but was otherwise neurologically normal. Thirteen months following radiotherapy a follow-up MRI revealed multifocal areas of abnormal enhancement, all within the treated fields (Figs 5A, 5B). T2-weighted images revealed increased signal abnormalities corresponding to the enhancing lesions (Figs 5C, 5D). She was noted to have mild global cognitive dysfunction and suffered increasing seizures. Over the next several months the lesions enlarged and new lesions appeared. Over the following year the MRI abnormalities waxed and waned, with some lesions improving and other new ones appearing. The patient had progressive cognitive dysfunction and developed left hemiparesis, mostly affecting her arm. Biopsy of a large right frontal lesion revealed radiation necrosis. The arm weakness improved with corticosteroids. However, she was unable to care for herself and was placed in a nursing home. The appearance of serial MRIs stabilized, with multiple enhancing lesions remaining. When last seen in February 1995, the corticosteroids had been tapered and discontinued. She had moderate global cognitive dysfunction, particularly affecting her memory. She had mild bilateral long tract signs and was wheelchair dependent due to residual weakness in her lower extremities. Patient 4 A 26-year-old woman presented with a seizure and in June 1991 was found by MRI to have a left frontal mass. An anaplastic astrocytoma was diagnosed by biopsy. She received partial brain irradiation in 34 daily (M-F) fractions of 180 cGy to a total dose of 6,120 cGy through anteroposterior fields. She also received four courses of BCNU chemotherapy (200 mglm’ldose every 8 weeks, the first concurrent with radiotherapy), which because of pulmonary toxicity was changed to a combination regimen of VP-16 (100 mg/m’/ day x 3 days), vincristine ( 1.4 mg/m’), and procarbazine (100 mg orally/day x 7 days) (VVP) every 28 days for two courses. She was neurologically normal and continued to work full-time. Fourteen months after completing radiotherapy the patient developed multiple punctate areas of enhancement throughout the left hemisphere, all within the treated fields. F-18- Peterson et al: MRI Lesions after Cranial RT 239 F i g 3 , Patient 1 , (A. B ) Contra~t-enhancedT1-uieighted images demonstrate miiltifocaal pirnctate enhancing lesions that dewloped J I months after trcatnrent of a left frontal aJtroqtowa. (C. D , Folfow-up contrast-enharued images at 1 year show rompletr resolution of the nzultifocal images. Note mild atrophy as we[/. 240 Annals of Neurology Vol 38 N O 2 August 1995 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (not shown) revealed hypometabolism throughout the involved hemisphere. The patient was asymptomatic. Over several months the lesions evolved radiographically, and a large confluent left frontal enhancing mass developed. The patient developed language dysfunction characterized by wordfinding difficulty and stuttering. Biopsy revealed radiation necrosis. The large left frontal mass and the smaller punctate lesions remained for about 6 months and then gradually resolved, so that they were no longer apparent on scans about 1 year Fig 4. Patient 2. (A, B ) Contrast-enhanced TI -weighted images shoul multifocal enhancing abnormalities that developed 8 months after cotnpletion of radiation. Follow-zip studies at 2. 4, and 6 months after completion of radiation (not shouwj shwed no change in the pattern of enhancement and ubere ez~idencethat the abnormalities did not represent recurrent disseminated tumor. (C) This treatment planning film shows the target areas for the treatment (small arrow) and “boost”(large arrow), and demonstrates that the posterior fossa lesions icere ioithin the treatment field but not at the center of the target tiolume. later. The patient’s symptoms improved with corticosteroid therapy. Unfortunately, the patient developed biopsy-proved recurrent glioblastoma multiforme, posterior to the area of necrosis, which was unresponsive to additional chemotherapy. She died of progressive tumor in February 1994. Patient 5 A 45-year-old man was diagnosed in September 1992 with a left frontal glioblastoma multiforme. He underwent resection followed by focal irradiation in 30 daily (M-F) fractions of 200 cGy each, to a total dose of 6,000 cGy through right and left lateral fields. He also received one course of combination procarbazine/CCNU/vincristine (PCV) (details not known), one course of BCNU (details not known), three courses of intravenous methotrexate (6,000mg/dose), and an additional course of BCNU (200 mg/m2). Eleven months after treatment the patient was asymptomatic. There was no evidence of recurrent tumor at the primary site on follow-up MRI. but new multifocal punctate areas of enhancement developed in both hemispheres within the treatment fields. Because of the proximity of these lesions to the ventricular system, he underwent lumbar puncture and analysis of the CSF revealed 7 white blood cells/mmi, protein concentration of 165 mg/dl, and no malignant cells. The patient developed mild aphasia over the next several months. The left frontal abnormality enlarged, while others remained stable or improved. Progressive aphasia prompted surgical debulking of the large left frontal lesion. The histopathological diagnosis was radiation necrosis. After surgical debulking the patient’s language improved but did not return to normal. Right hemispheric abnormalities persisted, though Peterson et al: MRI Lesions after Cranial RT 241 Fig 5. Patient 3. (A, B ) Contrasi-enhanced TI-weighted images demonstrate multifocal enhancing lesions that developed I 3 months after the completion of radiotherapy. The larger, right frontal, ring-enhancing lesion waJ confirmed by biopsy to be radionecroszs. (C. D ) T2-weighted images demonstratefocal increased signal abnormalities corresponding to the enhancing lesi0n.c. as well as more diffuse white matter abnormalities characteristic of the white matter changes frequently obsewed after radiothevapy. 242 Annals of Neurology Vol 38 No 2 August 1795 they remained asymptomatic. When last seen in February 1995, the patient was mildly aphasic, which prevented him from working, but had no long tract signs and was living independently. Patient 6 In July 1992 a 48-year-old man presented with headaches and was found to have a large enhancing right temporal mass. He underwent gross total surgical resection with a histopathological diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme. He was treated with local-field radiotherapy. A dose of 4,600 cGy in 23 fractions of 200 cGy was delivered to the tumor and 3 cm surrounding the tissue, and a “boost” of 1,400 cGy in 7 fractions of 200 cGy each was delivered to the tumor and 2 cm surrounding the tissue, to a total dose of 6,000 cGy through right and left lateral fields. He also received intravenous BCNU (80 mg/m’/day x 3 days, every 8 weeks x 6, first course concurrent with radiotherapy). He was neurologically normal except for mild memory deficits. Seventeen months after completion of radiotherapy the patient had no new symptoms. The follow-up MRI showed no evidence of recurrence at the primary site. However, there were multiple areas of abnormal enhancement seen throughout the radiation fields, some of which appeared to be ringlike. Biopsy of a right frontal lesion revealed perivascular lymphocytic infiltration and gliosis, without evidence of malignancy. The patient’s course was one of fulminant progression, both clinically and radiographically. MRIs showed progressive enlargement of the enhancing lesions. He became stuporous, with bilateral long tract signs and refractory seizures. He died in June 1994. At autopsy the brain contained widespread radiation necrosis with only focal evidence of residual or recurrent tumor in the original operative site in the temporal lobe. Discussion Radiation necrosis is one of the late delayed complications of cranial irradiation, most commonly developing 1 to 3 years after the completion of treatment. Its incidence is determined by total radiation dose and fraction size, but overall it is described as an uncommon complication, occurring in about 5% of patients who receive a total dose of more than 4,500 cGy [2]. Its typical CT appearance is that of a single, hypodense mass, primarily in the white matter, which may have areas of hemorrhage, central necrosis, o r calcification, and irregular enhancement with contrast agents [lo131. MRI similarly reveals a hypointense, primarily white matter mass on T1-weighted images that enhances with gadolinium and that appears hyperintense with surrounding edema o n T2-weighted images [ 11, 141. Following cranial irradiation, another late delayed radiographic feature is diffuse white matter change o n C T or MRI, which is frequently seen in conjunction with focal radiation necrosis and which may coincide clinically with radiation-induced dementia [I 1- 141. Radiation necrosis frequently occurs at the site of the original treated tumor, and cannot be distinguished radiographically from recurrent tumor. The clinical presentation of radiation necrosis is also indistinguishable from that of recurrent tumor, presenting with focal neurological deficits o r seizures. Although there are reports of symptomatic improvement with surgical resection, corticosteroids [b},or anticoagulation [ 153, radiation necrosis is generally an irreversible process. T h e inability to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor clinically and radiographically necessitates biopsy in many instances. T h e histological features of radiation necrosis have been well described and consist of a hypocellular lesion often at the gray-white junction, with fibrin exudate and fibrinoid necrosis of small blood vessels. T h e predominant factor in its pathogenesis is thought to be related to endothelial injury, although direct glial damage o r immunological mechanisms have been suggested to play a contributing role [ 16- 191. T h e clinical and radiological syndrome described in the 6 patients here occurred between 8 and 3 1 months following the completion of cranial irradiation, in the same time interval as typical radiation necrosis. T h e MRI appearance of the lesions described, however, is distinct from the classic description of radiation necrosis. An analogous C T appearance of this unusual phenomenon was described previously by Safdari and coauthors [ZO]. T h e radiographic features may represent one stage in a series of events that may be reversible and resolve entirely, or may ultimately lead to frank radiation necrosis. In our patients the initial lesions were multifocal, distributed throughout both gray and white matter, and often punctate or small ( < I cm in diameter). T h e lesions were not located at the site of the primary tumor, and although they were all within the radiation fields they were not at the site of the highest calculated radiation dose. T h e appearance was indistinguishable from recurrent disseminated tumor. While some lesions evolved into the more typical mass lesion of necrosis, others resolved entirely. There was also a spectrum of clinical findings in these patients, from those who were asymptomatic to others who developed progressive focal neurological symptoms o r who died. Biopsy of a single small asymptomatic lesion was performed and examination of the specimen revealed gliosis and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate. Histological examination of large, symptomatic lesions demonstrated the characteristic features of radiation necrosis. T h e pathogenesis of the initial waxing and waning MRI lesions is unknown, and precise histological definition is hindered by their lack of symptoms and small size, which often makes biopsy or resection unwarranted or not feasible. W e suspect that they represent an early, sometimes reversible stage of radiation injury to the brain. T h e contribution, if any, of chemotherapy Peterson et al: MRI Lesions after Cranial RT 243 to the development of these MRI abnormalities is unknown but is not essential; 1 of our patients received no chemotherapy. When one encounters a patient with these multifocal MRI abnormalities following cranial irradiation, the possibility of radiation injury rather than recurrent tumor must be considered. Positron emission tomography or single-photon emission computed tomography studies may support a diagnosis of either radiation necrosis or recurrent tumor [21-24]. We found that in the asymptomatic patients a conservative course of observation and serial scans was justified to avoid an unnecessary brain biopsy. In some of these patients the lesions resolved or stabilized spontaneously. In the patients with symptomatic lesions, biopsy is important to distinguish radiation injury from recurrent tumor, and particularly to avoid inappropriate antineoplastic treatment. The role of anticoagulants, corticosteroids, or other modalities in the trearment of such MFU lesions is unknown. The authors are grateful to D r Richard W. Price for his helpful review of the manuscript. Presented in part at the American Neurological Association annual meeting, San Francisco, CA, October 10- 12, 1994. References 1. Delattre JY, Fuks 2, Krol G , ‘et al. Cerebral necrosis following neutron radiation of an extracranial tumor. J Neurooncol 1988; 6:113-117 2. Rottenberg DA. Acute and chronic effects of radiation on the nervous system. In: Rottenbeg DA, ed. Neurological complications of cancer treatment. Newton, MA: ButtenvorthHeinemann, 199 1:3-1? 3. Marsumura H, Ross ER. Delayed cerebral radionecrosis following treatment of carcinoma of the scalp: clinicopathologic and ultrastructural study. Surg Neurol 1979;12:193-204 4. Babu R, Huang PP, Epstein F, et al. Late radionecrosis of the brain: case report. J Neurooncol 1993;1?:37-42 5. Morris JGL, Grarran-Smith P, Panegyres PK, et al. Delayed cerebral radiation nrcrosis. Q J Med 1994;87:119-129 6. Gutin PH. Treatment of radiation necrosis of the brain. In: Gutin PH, Leibel SA, Sheline GE, eds. Radiation injury to the nervous system. New York: Raven, 1901:27 1-282 7. Sheline GE. Irradiation injury of the human brain: a review of clinical experience. In: Gilbert HA, Kagan AR, eds. Radiation damage to the nervous system. A delayed therapeutic hazard. New York: Raven, 1980:39-58 8. Lampert PW, Davis RL. Delayed effects of radiation on the 244 Annals of Neurology Vol 38 No 2 August 1995 human central nervous system. “Early” and “late” delayed reactions. Neurology 1964;14:912-917 9. Martins AN, Johnston 1.5, Henry JM. er al. Delayed radiation necrosis of the brain. J Neurosurg 1977;47:336-345 10. Kmgsley DPE, Kendall BE. CT of the adverse effects of therapeutic radiation of the central nervous system. AJNR 1981;2: 453-460 11. Batnitzky S, Halleran WJ, McMillan J H , et al. Radiologic manifestations of delayed radiation necrosis of the brain. Acta Radiol Suppl (Stockh) 1986;.369:231-234 12. Valk PE, Dillon WP. Diagnostic imaging of central nervous system radiation injury. In: Gutin PH. Leibel SA. Sheline GE, eds. Radiation injury to the nervous system. New York: Raven, 1991:2 11-238 13. Brismar J. Robertson G H , Davis KR. Radiation necrosis of the brain. Neuroradiological considerations with computed romography. Neuroradiology 1976;12:109-113 14. Curran WJ. Hecht-Leavit C, Schur L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of cranial radiation lesions. lnr J Radiat Cncol Biol Phys 1987;13: 1003- 1098 I S . Glanrz MJ, Burger PC, Friedman AH, et al. Treatment ofradiarion-induced nervous system injury with heparin and warfarin. Neurology 1994;44:2020-2026 16. Burger PC, Boyko OB. The pathology of central nervous system radiation injury. In: Gutin PH, Leibel SA, Sheline GE, eds. Radiation injury to the nervous system. New York: Raven, 1991: 19 1-2 10 17. Llena JF, Cespedes G. Hirano A, er al. Vascular alterations in delayed radiation necrosis of the brain. An electron microscopical study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1976;100:531-534 18. Phillips TL. Early and late effects of radiation on normal tissues. In: Gutin PH, L i b e l SA, Sheline GE, eds. Radiation injury to the nervous system. New York: Raven, 1991:37-55 10. Yarnaguchi N , Yamashima T, Yamashita J. A histological and tluw cytometric study of dog brain endothelial cell inpries in delayed radiation necrosis. J Neurosurg 1991;74.625-632 20. Safdari H , Boluix B, Gros C. Multifocal brain radionecrosis masquerading as tumor dissemination. Surg Neurol 1984;2 I : 35-41 21. DeChiro G , Oldfield E, Wright DC, et al. Cerebral necrosis after radiotherapy and/or inrraarterial chemotherapy for brain tumors; PET and neuroparhological studies. Am J Radiol 1988; 150:189-197 22. Patronas NJ, DiChiro G , Brooks RP, et al. Progress: [‘,‘F]fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography in the evaluation of radiation necrosis of the brain. Radiology 1982;144: 885-889 23. Doyle WK, Budinger TF, Valk PE, et al. Differentiation of cerebral radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence by F- 18-FDG and Rb-82 positron emission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:563-570 24. Schwartz RB, Carvalho PA, Alexander E, et al. Radiation necrosis vs high-grade recurrent glioma: differenriation by using dual isotope SPECT with ”’TI and ’““Tc-HMPAO. AJNR 1992;12: 1187-1 192
1/--страниц